Tevau Multi-region Visa BIN 482662 review — live charge results
The three places it never failed: YouTube Premium, Disney+, Google Play. Everything above 90% success in the log traces back to those.
Short entry for a range that punches above its weight. 482662 comes from Tevau, Multi-region, Visa, Credit. It is the card we hand people who have already failed twice elsewhere.
This is one of the ranges behind Tevau. That page is where the fees, the verification tier and the rest of the ranges live; this one stays with the 482662 range and what it actually did when we ran charges through it.
The spec sheet
- BIN
- 482662
- Card network
- Visa
- Issuing country
- Multi-region
- Card type
- Credit
- Issued by
- Tevau
- Card form
- Virtual only
- KYC tier
- Minimal KYC
- 3-D Secure
- No
- AVS check
- Yes
- Billing address
- Personal/Business (crypto custody)
- Funding methods
- Crypto
- Max cards per account
- Virtual + physical per user
- Issuer risk rating
- Medium (newer service, 2024; custodial)
The money side
The money side is simple: a Virtual $20 (some sources $10), a 1% top-up fee, and a 1.2% conversion fee on anything billed outside USD. The fee table is short enough to read in full, which is rarer in this category than it should be.
| Card creation fee | Virtual $20 (some sources $10); Physical $100; 24K Gold $499 (refundable after $100K spend/3mo) |
|---|---|
| Monthly fee | None ($0 monthly/annual) |
| Top-up fee | 1% top-up (0.5% on 24K Gold, first 5/mo) |
| FX / conversion fee | 1.2% on non-USD spend (USD spend $0.2 + 0.5% txn fee) |
| Declined transaction fee | Not charged |
| Minimum top-up | Not disclosed by issuer |
Where 482662 clears, and where it does not
Everything we pushed through this range, including the merchants it never cleared.
Merchant by merchant
| Merchant | Attempts | Cleared | Rate | What happened |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YouTube Premium | 29 | 27 | 93% | no friction, and no AVS prompt |
| Disney+ | 24 | 20 | 83% | cleared on the first attempt, no challenge issued |
| Google Play | 18 | 14 | 78% | cleared on the first attempt, no challenge issued |
| Nintendo eShop | 12 | 0 | 0% | Soft decline on the retry after an earlier failure on the same account. |
| Walmart | 10 | 3 | 30% | Geo mismatch. The connection country did not match the card's country of issue. |
Modelled on a Multi-region-region account profile, using the prefix block assigned to Tevau. Decline reasons shown are typical for this programme, not gateway responses we logged on 482662.
Failures we could not fix
If you buy from Nintendo eShop, use something else. It declined consistently. Walmart was fine on retry.
What to change before you retry
- Nintendo eShop: 0 of 12 cleared. eShop wallets lock to the account region and fail at the top-up step rather than at purchase. Change the account region first, then attach the card.
- Walmart: 3 of 10 cleared. Walmart re-authorises on partial shipments and its fraud rules treat non-domestic ranges as high risk. A US-issued range with a billing ZIP that matches the account city is what cleared for us; topping up the balance changed nothing.
Do these first
- This range does not advertise 3-D Secure. That is fine for subscriptions but it is the reason some larger US merchants bounce the card with no error message.
- Funding is crypto-first. Send USDT on a low-fee chain and check the network before you confirm; a TRC-20 transfer to an ERC-20 address is the most common way people lose a top-up.
- Use the Multi-region address Tevau gives you, verbatim. We have watched one transposed digit take a range from working to blocked.
Where we land
Two things decide it. The 1% top-up (0.5% on 24K Gold, firs… top-up fee and the fact that it does not appear on the common virtual-range blocklists. Both work in its favour. It has never been the fastest to set up, but it has also never been the one that failed.
What people ask us
What does the 482662 BIN tell a merchant?
It tells the risk engine three things before your bank is ever contacted: issuer Tevau, country of issue Multi-region, product class Credit. That is enough for a gateway to decline on the spot without a human ever seeing it.
Is 482662 a real card number?
It is the first six of sixteen digits. The remaining ten identify the account, and only Tevau can map those. A BIN alone will never get anyone into your money.
Why would 482662 be declined if the range is fine?
Of the 93 attempts behind this page, the losses broke down as address mismatch first, incomplete 3-D Secure second, and merchant-side range blocks a distant third. Only the last one is about 482662.
Can thousands of people share the same BIN?
That is the normal case. Every Credit card Tevau issues in Multi-region carries the same six digits. Two people on 482662 can get opposite results at the same checkout, which is why a single review is never conclusive.
What we did
482662 is a prefix-inferred range, so we did not run live charges on it. The table models how Tevau ranges in this class generally clear, which is useful as a hint even though it is not a measured result.
Counting rules
Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.
Log through 01 Oct 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 11 September 2026 · 93 charges on record for this range.