BIN lookup · Visa · Ireland · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

BIN 417692: Ireland Visa Virtual Card (Debit)

Bottom line

Where it cleared without drama: Google Play, Epic Games Store, Steam. All three passed first time and survived a renewal four weeks later.

417692Visa IrelandDebit 183/250 cleared

We keep coming back to 417692 when a merchant blocks the well-known virtual ranges. It comes from Pyra Card in Ireland and does not sit on the usual blocklists.

417692, decoded

BIN
417692
Card network
Visa
Issuing country
Ireland
Card type
Debit
Issued by
Pyra Card
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
ID + proof
3-D Secure
Not published
AVS check
No
Billing address
Self-custody
Funding methods
Crypto
Max cards per account
Not published
Issuer risk rating
Medium

Running costs

The money side is simple: no issuance fee, a 0.5% top-up fee, and a 2% conversion fee on anything billed outside USD. For a single card that is acceptable. Multiply it across five and it stops being acceptable.

Card creation feeFree
Monthly feeFree (no maintenance)
Top-up fee0.5% (collateral swap); 0.5% (bank transfer)
FX / conversion fee1.2-2% (non-USD)
Declined transaction fee
Minimum top-up

Results by merchant

Merchant by merchant, in the order we charged them. The rates below count renewals as well as first charges.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Google Play807695%cleared, 3-D Secure completed in-app in under 20 seconds
Epic Games Store655788%cleared first time; a second charge a week later also went through
Steam504284%cleared on the first attempt, no challenge issued
Crunchyroll3200%3-D Secure challenge never completed. The order timed out waiting for the OTP.
Hetzner23835%3-D Secure challenge never completed. The order timed out waiting for the OTP.

Run from a Ireland-region account between 18 Jun to 27 Aug 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

Failures were rare but real: Crunchyroll declined on three attempts, and we never did get it through.

What to change before you retry

Do these first

  1. Use the Ireland address Pyra Card gives you, verbatim. We have watched one transposed digit take a range from working to blocked.
  2. Funding is crypto-first. Send USDT on a low-fee chain and check the network before you confirm; a TRC-20 transfer to an ERC-20 address is the most common way people lose a top-up.
  3. This is an anonymous-account product. There is no meaningful account recovery, so export the card details and the billing address the moment you create them.

Final word

Accurate summary: cheap to start, mid-priced to run, dependable enough that we stopped testing workarounds. That was true on our accounts. Yours may sit in a different risk bucket, which changes the result.

What people ask us

What does the 417692 BIN tell a merchant?

Roughly: who issued it, where, and what kind of product it is. Most declines we log happen at this step, which is why swapping the range fixes problems that changing the balance never does.

Is 417692 a real card number?

No, and this trips people up. 417692 is a range identifier shared across every card Pyra Card issues in Ireland. It is printed on the front of the card, which tells you how sensitive it is not.

Why would 417692 be declined if the range is fine?

Changing one variable at a time is the only way to diagnose this. Address first, then card, then the connection country. We have seen people change all three and learn nothing.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

Yes, and it is worth internalising. When someone reports that a range is dead, what they usually mean is that their account got flagged, not the range.

How we got these numbers

We bought a Pyra Card card, funded it, and pushed 250 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 18 Jun to 27 Aug 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 183 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 03 September 2026 · 250 charges on record for this range.