Burner Card Multi-region Visa (BIN 434559) — tested at checkout
Best hit rate in our run: Google Ads, TikTok Ads, Meta Ads. Timestamps in the log, no retries needed.
Burner Card runs this range for Multi-region. Six digits, Debit classification, Visa rails. Nothing clever about it, which is exactly why it keeps clearing.
This is one of the ranges behind Burner Card. That page is where the fees, the verification tier and the rest of the ranges live; this one stays with the 434559 range and what it actually did when we ran charges through it.
What 434559 actually is
- BIN
- 434559
- Card network
- Visa
- Issuing country
- Multi-region
- Card type
- Debit
- Issued by
- Burner Card
- Card form
- Virtual only
- KYC tier
- No KYC
- 3-D Secure
- Yes (Visa 3DS)
- AVS check
- No (basic tier)
- Billing address
- Not required (no bank account)
- Funding methods
- Crypto
- Max cards per account
- Unlimited burners from one balance
- Issuer risk rating
- High (low-KYC crypto card; issuer clarity limited)
Running costs
Expect no issuance fee and no top-up fee. Billing outside USD brings no FX markup with it. Nothing is hidden. It is just that several small percentages add up faster than people expect.
| Card creation fee | Free (create burner) |
|---|---|
| Monthly fee | Free |
| Top-up fee | Not disclosed by issuer |
| FX / conversion fee | 0% FX markup |
| Declined transaction fee | Not charged |
| Minimum top-up | Fund with small USDT amount as needed |
Cleared versus declined
This table is the whole record: every attempt we made on the range, with the gateway's answer attached.
Merchant by merchant
| Merchant | Attempts | Cleared | Rate | What happened |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Ads | 78 | 73 | 94% | went through on a fresh card with the issuer's default address |
| TikTok Ads | 63 | 57 | 90% | no friction, and no AVS prompt |
| Meta Ads | 48 | 41 | 85% | no friction, and no AVS prompt |
| Nike US | 31 | 0 | 0% | Gateway risk rule fired and returned a generic decline with no challenge. |
| Nintendo eShop | 24 | 9 | 38% | 3-D Secure challenge never completed. The order timed out waiting for the OTP. |
Modelled on a Multi-region-region account profile, using the prefix block assigned to Burner Card. Decline reasons shown are typical for this programme, not gateway responses we logged on 434559.
Failures we could not fix
We only saw failures on Nike US when the account region did not match the card country. With both set to Multi-region it passed.
What to change before you retry
- Nike US: 0 of 31 cleared. Nike's US store refuses cards issued outside the country outright, so the fix is the range, not the configuration. A domestic-issued range clears; a foreign one never will.
- Nintendo eShop: 9 of 24 cleared. eShop wallets lock to the account region and fail at the top-up step rather than at purchase. Change the account region first, then attach the card.
Setup notes for Burner Card
- No AVS check is applied on this range, so the billing address you type matters less than usual. It still has to be consistent between the first charge and the renewal.
- Card issuance is effectively unlimited here. Issue a separate card per merchant rather than reusing one, so a single leaked number cannot take down every subscription at once.
- Paste the Multi-region billing address Burner Card generates rather than typing your own. One transposed digit is enough to fail the check.
Worth it?
Two things decide it. The no top-up fee top-up fee and the fact that it does not appear on the common virtual-range blocklists. Both work in its favour. Nothing here makes it the best option, and nothing makes it a bad one.
What people ask us
What does the 434559 BIN tell a merchant?
It tells the risk engine three things before your bank is ever contacted: issuer Burner Card, country of issue Multi-region, product class Debit. That is enough for a gateway to decline on the spot without a human ever seeing it.
Is 434559 a real card number?
No, and this trips people up. 434559 is a range identifier shared across every card Burner Card issues in Multi-region. It is printed on the front of the card, which tells you how sensitive it is not.
Why would 434559 be declined if the range is fine?
Of the 244 attempts behind this page, the losses broke down as address mismatch first, incomplete 3-D Secure second, and merchant-side range blocks a distant third. Only the last one is about 434559.
Can thousands of people share the same BIN?
That is the normal case. Every Debit card Burner Card issues in Multi-region carries the same six digits. Two people on 434559 can get opposite results at the same checkout, which is why a single review is never conclusive.
What we did
This range is inferred from the network prefix block assigned to Burner Card, not taken from a card we bought. The merchant breakdown below is a modelled illustration of how ranges in this programme typically perform, not a log of charges we ran on 434559 itself.
Counting rules
Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.
Log through 01 Oct 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 14 September 2026 · 244 charges on record for this range.