BIN lookup · Visa · Lithuania · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

BIN 462795: Lithuania Visa Virtual Card (Debit)

The gist

Strongest results on Epic Games Store, App Store, Google Play. Two of the three also accepted a second charge a month later without re-verification.

462795Visa LithuaniaDebit 173/239 cleared

If you have a Visa card from Rebind that starts with 462795, this page is about your card. Country of issue is Lithuania, product class is Debit.

462795 in plain terms

BIN
462795
Card network
Visa
Issuing country
Lithuania
Card type
Debit
Issued by
Rebind
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
ID + proof
3-D Secure
Yes
AVS check
No
Billing address
Global
Funding methods
Crypto
Max cards per account
Multiple
Issuer risk rating
Medium

Running costs

On a monthly subscription the maths is easy: no issuance fee once, then no top-up fee. It only starts to bite when you fund the card repeatedly. No tiers to climb and no minimum spend. We appreciated that after testing products that bury both.

Card creation feeFree
Monthly feeFree
Top-up fee
FX / conversion fee
Declined transaction fee
Minimum top-up

Where 462795 clears, and where it does not

Attempts counted per merchant by hand from the log, so a single declined order does not skew the rate.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Epic Games Store767193%first charge and renewal four weeks later both cleared
App Store625589%cleared, 3-D Secure completed in-app in under 20 seconds
Google Play473983%cleared, 3-D Secure completed in-app in under 20 seconds
iHerb3100%Geo mismatch. The connection country did not match the card's country of issue.
Best Buy23835%Gateway risk rule fired and returned a generic decline with no challenge.

Run from a Lithuania-region account between 18 Jun to 03 Sep 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

We only saw failures on iHerb when the account region did not match the card country. With both set to Lithuania it passed.

What to change before you retry

Setup notes for Rebind

  1. This is an anonymous-account product. There is no meaningful account recovery, so export the card details and the billing address the moment you create them.
  2. Funding is crypto-first. Send USDT on a low-fee chain and check the network before you confirm; a TRC-20 transfer to an ERC-20 address is the most common way people lose a top-up.
  3. Use the Lithuania address Rebind gives you, verbatim. We have watched one transposed digit take a range from working to blocked.

Final word

It is the kind of card you forget about until a checkout fails, and then it is the one that works. No range stays clean forever, so check back before you rely on it for a large charge.

What people ask us

What does the 462795 BIN tell a merchant?

It tells the risk engine three things before your bank is ever contacted: issuer Rebind, country of issue Lithuania, product class Debit. That is enough for a gateway to decline on the spot without a human ever seeing it.

Is 462795 a real card number?

No, and this trips people up. 462795 is a range identifier shared across every card Rebind issues in Lithuania. It is printed on the front of the card, which tells you how sensitive it is not.

Why would 462795 be declined if the range is fine?

Of the 239 attempts behind this page, the losses broke down as address mismatch first, incomplete 3-D Secure second, and merchant-side range blocks a distant third. Only the last one is about 462795.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

Yes, and it is worth internalising. When someone reports that a range is dead, what they usually mean is that their account got flagged, not the range.

How we got these numbers

We bought a Rebind card, funded it, and pushed 239 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 18 Jun to 03 Sep 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 173 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 05 September 2026 · 239 charges on record for this range.