BIN lookup · Mastercard · Lithuania · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

BIN 530607 (Lithuania, Mastercard) - What It Works On

The takeaway

We would rank Disney+, Spotify Premium, YouTube Premium as the safest bets on this range, based on 127 passes out of 178 attempts.

530607Mastercard LithuaniaCredit 127/178 cleared

Not every range needs a long write-up. This one is Mintyn, Lithuania, Mastercard, Credit, and it does the job without much fuss.

530607, decoded

BIN
530607
Card network
Mastercard
Issuing country
Lithuania
Card type
Credit
Issued by
Mintyn
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
ID + proof
3-D Secure
Not published
AVS check
No
Billing address
Not published
Funding methods
Bank transfer
Max cards per account
Not published
Issuer risk rating
Medium

Costs, stacked up

Three lines decide it. Issuance: no issuance fee. Funding: no top-up fee. Conversion: no FX markup. Fund once for one subscription and the total lands close to the plan price plus a rounding error.

Card creation feeFree (level 3)
Monthly fee$0 (no monthly fee)
Top-up fee
FX / conversion fee
Declined transaction fee
Minimum top-up$5

Results by merchant

Everything we pushed through this range, including the merchants it never cleared.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Disney+565293%cleared, 3-D Secure completed in-app in under 20 seconds
Spotify Premium464087%cleared on the first attempt, no challenge issued
YouTube Premium352983%first charge and renewal four weeks later both cleared
Sephora US2300%Gateway risk rule fired and returned a generic decline with no challenge.
Hulu18633%AVS mismatch. The ZIP on file did not match the address registered to the card.

Run from a Lithuania-region account between 23 Jul to 20 Aug 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

The pattern in our failures is geographic. Sephora US accepted it once the account region matched Lithuania, and refused it every time it did not.

What to change before you retry

Getting it to work first time

  1. This range does not advertise 3-D Secure. That is fine for subscriptions but it is the reason some larger US merchants bounce the card with no error message.
  2. The minimum load is $5. Start there rather than at the maximum, because an untested range is not worth a large balance.
  3. Paste the Lithuania billing address Mintyn generates rather than typing your own. One transposed digit is enough to fail the check.

What the numbers add up to

Two things decide it. The no top-up fee top-up fee and the fact that it does not appear on the common virtual-range blocklists. Both work in its favour. Take the Credit label seriously though. Some merchant rules treat it differently to credit.

FAQ

What does the 530607 BIN tell a merchant?

It tells the risk engine three things before your bank is ever contacted: issuer Mintyn, country of issue Lithuania, product class Credit. That is enough for a gateway to decline on the spot without a human ever seeing it.

Is 530607 a real card number?

No, and this trips people up. 530607 is a range identifier shared across every card Mintyn issues in Lithuania. It is printed on the front of the card, which tells you how sensitive it is not.

Why would 530607 be declined if the range is fine?

Of the 178 attempts behind this page, the losses broke down as address mismatch first, incomplete 3-D Secure second, and merchant-side range blocks a distant third. Only the last one is about 530607.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

That is the normal case. Every Credit card Mintyn issues in Lithuania carries the same six digits. Two people on 530607 can get opposite results at the same checkout, which is why a single review is never conclusive.

What we did

We bought a Mintyn card, funded it, and pushed 178 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 23 Jul to 20 Aug 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 127 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 24 August 2026 · 178 charges on record for this range.