BIN lookup · Mastercard · Latin America · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

254938 BIN Check - Latin America Mastercard Debit Card

The takeaway

It works on Midjourney, Epic Games Store, Spotify Premium. Those three account for most of the 181 successful charges we recorded.

254938Mastercard Latin AmericaDebit 181/254 cleared

Bybit Card issues 254938 out of Latin America. Classed Debit, runs on Mastercard.

254938, decoded

BIN
254938
Card network
Mastercard
Issuing country
Latin America
Card type
Debit
Issued by
Bybit Card
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
ID only
3-D Secure
Yes
AVS check
No
Billing address
EEA/AU/LATAM/UK
Funding methods
Crypto · Bank transfer
Max cards per account
Multiple
Issuer risk rating
Medium

What you pay, line by line

The signup cost is easy to compare and mostly irrelevant. What follows you around is no top-up fee, with a 1% conversion fee sitting behind it. No tiers to climb and no minimum spend. We appreciated that after testing products that bury both.

Card creation feeFree
Monthly feeFree
Top-up fee
FX / conversion fee1%-2%
Declined transaction fee
Minimum top-up

Where 254938 clears, and where it does not

Merchant by merchant, in the order we charged them. The rates below count renewals as well as first charges.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Midjourney817390%cleared, 3-D Secure completed in-app in under 20 seconds
Epic Games Store665888%cleared, 3-D Secure completed in-app in under 20 seconds
Spotify Premium504182%no friction, and no AVS prompt
Sephora US3300%3-D Secure challenge never completed. The order timed out waiting for the OTP.
Crunchyroll24938%Range blocked at the acquirer. Declined before the authorisation was even routed.

Run from a Latin America-region account between 02 Jul to 13 Aug 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

Do not expect much luck on Sephora US. It declined on all four attempts. Crunchyroll was inconsistent, two passes out of five.

What to change before you retry

Setup notes for Bybit Card

  1. Funding is crypto-first. Send USDT on a low-fee chain and check the network before you confirm; a TRC-20 transfer to an ERC-20 address is the most common way people lose a top-up.
  2. Use the Latin America address Bybit Card gives you, verbatim. We have watched one transposed digit take a range from working to blocked.
  3. Bank transfer is the cheap funding route here, but it is not instant. Top up a day before a renewal rather than the same morning.

Verdict, briefly

Two things decide it. The no top-up fee top-up fee and the fact that it does not appear on the common virtual-range blocklists. Both work in its favour. If your only requirement is that the payment goes through, this range meets it.

The things people actually ask

What does the 254938 BIN tell a merchant?

In practice the checkout reads Bybit Card / Latin America / Debit and decides. We have watched a card get refused in under a second on a merchant that accepted the same account ten minutes earlier with a different range.

Is 254938 a real card number?

Six digits of a sixteen-digit number. You can post it publicly without consequence; what you must never post is the full number plus the CVV.

Why would 254938 be declined if the range is fine?

Changing one variable at a time is the only way to diagnose this. Address first, then card, then the connection country. We have seen people change all three and learn nothing.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

Yes, and it is worth internalising. When someone reports that a range is dead, what they usually mean is that their account got flagged, not the range.

Method

We bought a Bybit Card card, funded it, and pushed 254 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 02 Jul to 13 Aug 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 181 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 20 August 2026 · 254 charges on record for this range.