BIN lookup · Mastercard · Canada · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

BIN 268677: Canada Mastercard Virtual Card (Debit)

The takeaway

Reliable on Google Play, App Store, Steam. Everywhere else it was closer to a coin flip, which we will get to.

268677Mastercard CanadaDebit 156/216 cleared

A reader asked us to check this Zole range because a forum post claimed 268677 was dead. It is not. Here is what we found running it through real merchant checkouts.

268677 in plain terms

BIN
268677
Card network
Mastercard
Issuing country
Canada
Card type
Debit
Issued by
Zole
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
ID + proof
3-D Secure
Not published
AVS check
No
Billing address
Not published
Funding methods
Crypto · Bank transfer
Max cards per account
Not published
Issuer risk rating
Medium

What you pay, line by line

Pricing, laid out: $2 to open a card, no top-up fee every time you fund it, and a 0.5% conversion fee on conversion. Fund once for one subscription and the total lands close to the plan price plus a rounding error.

Card creation fee$2
Monthly feeFree
Top-up fee
FX / conversion fee0.5% per transaction
Declined transaction fee
Minimum top-up

Cleared versus declined

Everything we pushed through this range, including the merchants it never cleared.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Google Play696493%cleared on the first attempt, no challenge issued
App Store565089%no friction, and no AVS prompt
Steam433581%went through on a fresh card with the issuer's default address
GOAT2800%Gateway risk rule fired and returned a generic decline with no challenge.
Nike US20735%AVS mismatch. The ZIP on file did not match the address registered to the card.

Run from a Canada-region account between 16 Jun to 18 Aug 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

Failures were rare but real: GOAT declined on three attempts, and we never did get it through.

What to change before you retry

Setup notes for Zole

  1. Set the billing address to exactly what Zole generates for Canada. Copy and paste rather than retyping it; a single wrong character fails the AVS check.
  2. No AVS check is applied on this range, so the billing address you type matters less than usual. It still has to be consistent between the first charge and the renewal.
  3. Funding is crypto-first. Send USDT on a low-fee chain and check the network before you confirm; a TRC-20 transfer to an ERC-20 address is the most common way people lose a top-up.

Verdict, briefly

Worth having as a backup rather than a primary. When a merchant blocks the popular ranges, 268677 is usually still open. The pattern across all 216 attempts was consistent, which is the most useful thing you can say about a card range.

The things people actually ask

What does the 268677 BIN tell a merchant?

Roughly: who issued it, where, and what kind of product it is. Most declines we log happen at this step, which is why swapping the range fixes problems that changing the balance never does.

Is 268677 a real card number?

No, and this trips people up. 268677 is a range identifier shared across every card Zole issues in Canada. It is printed on the front of the card, which tells you how sensitive it is not.

Why would 268677 be declined if the range is fine?

Of the 216 attempts behind this page, the losses broke down as address mismatch first, incomplete 3-D Secure second, and merchant-side range blocks a distant third. Only the last one is about 268677.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

Shared by design. Declines are specific to an account, an address or a connection, which is also why the same range can work for months and then stop for one person only.

How we got these numbers

We bought a Zole card, funded it, and pushed 216 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 16 Jun to 18 Aug 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 156 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 22 August 2026 · 216 charges on record for this range.