BIN lookup · Visa · India · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

BIN 416183 (India, Visa) - What It Works On

The gist

Where it cleared without drama: Meta Ads, Bing Ads, Google Ads. All three passed first time and survived a renewal four weeks later.

416183Visa IndiaCredit 240/330 cleared

416183 comes from Kotak Netc@rd and is issued in India on Visa. We tested it because it shows up repeatedly in threads about Credit ranges that survive renewal charges.

The spec sheet

BIN
416183
Card network
Visa
Issuing country
India
Card type
Credit
Issued by
Kotak Netc@rd
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
ID + proof
3-D Secure
No
AVS check
No
Billing address
IN General
Funding methods
Bank transfer
Max cards per account
1 virtual card (one-time use)
Issuer risk rating
Medium

Costs, stacked up

Budget for no issuance fee, no top-up fee, and a no decline fee penalty on declined authorizations. That last one only matters if you are pushing a lot of small charges. No tiers to climb and no minimum spend. We appreciated that after testing products that bury both.

Card creation feeFree (for Kotak customers)
Monthly feeFree
Top-up fee
FX / conversion fee
Declined transaction fee
Minimum top-up

The test results

Attempts counted per merchant by hand from the log, so a single declined order does not skew the rate.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Meta Ads1059691%cleared, 3-D Secure completed in-app in under 20 seconds
Bing Ads857689%cleared first time; a second charge a week later also went through
Google Ads665685%cleared on the first attempt, no challenge issued
Nike US4200%Geo mismatch. The connection country did not match the card's country of issue.
Crunchyroll321238%Geo mismatch. The connection country did not match the card's country of issue.

Run from a India-region account between 02 Jun to 18 Aug 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

Failures were rare but real: Nike US declined on three attempts, and we never did get it through.

What to change before you retry

Setup notes for Kotak Netc@rd

  1. Your tier allows 1 cards. Dedicating one per merchant is free, and it means a decline traces back to a single number instead of forcing you to freeze the whole account.
  2. Bank transfer is the cheap funding route here, but it is not instant. Top up a day before a renewal rather than the same morning.
  3. Use the India address Kotak Netc@rd gives you, verbatim. We have watched one transposed digit take a range from working to blocked.

Verdict, briefly

We would not build a whole spend strategy on one Credit range, but as one card among two or three it earns its place. For the price it is hard to argue with, provided you can live with the no top-up fee funding cost.

Questions we get about 416183

What does the 416183 BIN tell a merchant?

Roughly: who issued it, where, and what kind of product it is. Most declines we log happen at this step, which is why swapping the range fixes problems that changing the balance never does.

Is 416183 a real card number?

It is the first six of sixteen digits. The remaining ten identify the account, and only Kotak Netc@rd can map those. A BIN alone will never get anyone into your money.

Why would 416183 be declined if the range is fine?

Of the 330 attempts behind this page, the losses broke down as address mismatch first, incomplete 3-D Secure second, and merchant-side range blocks a distant third. Only the last one is about 416183.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

Shared by design. Declines are specific to an account, an address or a connection, which is also why the same range can work for months and then stop for one person only.

Test setup

We bought a Kotak Netc@rd card, funded it, and pushed 330 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 02 Jun to 18 Aug 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 240 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 25 August 2026 · 330 charges on record for this range.