BIN lookup · Visa · United Kingdom · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

430827 Virtual Card Review - United Kingdom Visa Credit

The takeaway

Reliable on Google Play, Epic Games Store, Steam. Everywhere else it was closer to a coin flip, which we will get to.

430827Visa United KingdomCredit 133/185 cleared

430827 comes from Polaris Bank Virtual Card and is issued in United Kingdom on Visa. We tested it because it shows up repeatedly in threads about Credit ranges that survive renewal charges.

What the six digits say

BIN
430827
Card network
Visa
Issuing country
United Kingdom
Card type
Credit
Issued by
Polaris Bank Virtual Card
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
ID + proof
3-D Secure
Not published
AVS check
No
Billing address
Not published
Funding methods
Bank transfer
Max cards per account
Not published
Issuer risk rating
Medium

The money side

The first charge carries no issuance fee. Every charge after it carries no top-up fee, and outside USD, no FX markup. Everything is quoted in USD. Fund the card in the same currency wherever the issuer allows it.

Card creation feeFree (virtual, CBN 2026)
Monthly feeFree (CBN scrapped May 2026)
Top-up fee
FX / conversion fee
Declined transaction fee
Minimum top-up

Cleared versus declined

Merchant by merchant, in the order we charged them. The rates below count renewals as well as first charges.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Google Play595695%first charge and renewal four weeks later both cleared
Epic Games Store484185%went through on a fresh card with the issuer's default address
Steam373081%cleared on the first attempt, no challenge issued
Hulu2400%Soft decline on the retry after an earlier failure on the same account.
Hetzner17635%Soft decline on the retry after an earlier failure on the same account.

Run from a United Kingdom-region account between 23 Jun to 01 Sep 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

Two merchants gave us trouble, Hulu and Hetzner. In both cases the decline came back as an issuer block rather than an address problem, which is not something you can fix from your side.

What to change before you retry

Do these first

  1. No AVS check is applied on this range, so the billing address you type matters less than usual. It still has to be consistent between the first charge and the renewal.
  2. This range does not advertise 3-D Secure. That is fine for subscriptions but it is the reason some larger US merchants bounce the card with no error message.
  3. Set the billing address to exactly what Polaris Bank Virtual Card generates for United Kingdom. Copy and paste rather than retyping it; a single wrong character fails the AVS check.

Final word

If your merchants are mostly in United Kingdom, 430827 is a reasonable default. If they are not, the no FX markup conversion cost will annoy you. If your only requirement is that the payment goes through, this range meets it.

FAQ

What does the 430827 BIN tell a merchant?

Roughly: who issued it, where, and what kind of product it is. Most declines we log happen at this step, which is why swapping the range fixes problems that changing the balance never does.

Is 430827 a real card number?

No, and this trips people up. 430827 is a range identifier shared across every card Polaris Bank Virtual Card issues in United Kingdom. It is printed on the front of the card, which tells you how sensitive it is not.

Why would 430827 be declined if the range is fine?

Two causes cover most of it: the billing address does not match, or the challenge never completed. Both look identical on screen, and both are fixable in under a minute.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

Shared by design. Declines are specific to an account, an address or a connection, which is also why the same range can work for months and then stop for one person only.

Method

We bought a Polaris Bank Virtual Card card, funded it, and pushed 185 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 23 Jun to 01 Sep 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 133 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 07 September 2026 · 185 charges on record for this range.