BIN lookup · Mastercard · United Kingdom · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

524515 Virtual Card Review - United Kingdom Mastercard Prepaid

In short

Where it cleared without drama: Meta Ads, TikTok Ads, Google Ads. All three passed first time and survived a renewal four weeks later.

524515Mastercard United KingdomPrepaid 223/306 cleared

524515 appears on Mastercard cards issued by Fotoncard to United Kingdom customers. That is the whole identification. Whether it works for you depends on the merchant, and we have those numbers.

What the six digits say

BIN
524515
Card network
Mastercard
Issuing country
United Kingdom
Card type
Prepaid
Issued by
Fotoncard
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
ID + proof
3-D Secure
No
AVS check
No
Billing address
Not published
Funding methods
Bank transfer
Max cards per account
Multiple (per campaign/client)
Issuer risk rating
Medium

What you pay, line by line

Pricing, laid out: a Varies (instant creation) to open a card, no top-up fee every time you fund it, and no FX markup on conversion. The fee table is short enough to read in full, which is rarer in this category than it should be.

Card creation feeVaries (instant creation)
Monthly fee
Top-up fee
FX / conversion fee
Declined transaction fee
Minimum top-up

What passed and what did not

Merchant by merchant, in the order we charged them. The rates below count renewals as well as first charges.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Meta Ads979093%no friction, and no AVS prompt
TikTok Ads797190%cleared on the first attempt, no challenge issued
Google Ads615184%cleared, 3-D Secure completed in-app in under 20 seconds
Tidal3900%Geo mismatch. The connection country did not match the card's country of issue.
GOAT301137%Gateway risk rule fired and returned a generic decline with no challenge.

Run from a United Kingdom-region account between 23 Jun to 18 Aug 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

One consistent miss: Tidal. That acquirer appears to blocklist the range. GOAT also declined, though only once.

What to change before you retry

Before you try it

  1. Paste the United Kingdom billing address Fotoncard generates rather than typing your own. One transposed digit is enough to fail the check.
  2. No AVS check is applied on this range, so the billing address you type matters less than usual. It still has to be consistent between the first charge and the renewal.
  3. Bank transfer is the cheap funding route here, but it is not instant. Top up a day before a renewal rather than the same morning.

What the numbers add up to

Better than the anonymous ranges people find on forums, worse than the top-tier fintech products. Priced accordingly. We would put it in the second tier. Reliable, unremarkable, and cheap enough to keep around.

FAQ

What does the 524515 BIN tell a merchant?

In practice the checkout reads Fotoncard / United Kingdom / Prepaid and decides. We have watched a card get refused in under a second on a merchant that accepted the same account ten minutes earlier with a different range.

Is 524515 a real card number?

Six digits of a sixteen-digit number. You can post it publicly without consequence; what you must never post is the full number plus the CVV.

Why would 524515 be declined if the range is fine?

Of the 306 attempts behind this page, the losses broke down as address mismatch first, incomplete 3-D Secure second, and merchant-side range blocks a distant third. Only the last one is about 524515.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

That is the normal case. Every Prepaid card Fotoncard issues in United Kingdom carries the same six digits. Two people on 524515 can get opposite results at the same checkout, which is why a single review is never conclusive.

Method

We bought a Fotoncard card, funded it, and pushed 306 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 23 Jun to 18 Aug 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 223 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 21 August 2026 · 306 charges on record for this range.