BIN lookup · Mastercard · Brazil · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

Mastercard Virtual Card BIN 538384 - Brazil (Debit)

In short

The range did well against Steam, Epic Games Store, Google Play. We logged 185 successful authorizations out of 258 attempts across the test window.

538384Mastercard BrazilDebit 185/258 cleared

The first thing to know about 538384 is that it is not an anonymous range. Nubank issues it in Brazil and the Mastercard prefix is registered, which is why fewer merchants treat it as high risk.

538384, decoded

BIN
538384
Card network
Mastercard
Issuing country
Brazil
Card type
Debit
Issued by
Nubank
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
ID + proof
3-D Secure
Not published
AVS check
No
Billing address
Not published
Funding methods
Bank transfer
Max cards per account
Not published
Issuer risk rating
Medium

The money side

The first charge carries no issuance fee. Every charge after it carries no top-up fee, and outside USD, a 2.38% conversion fee. The fee table is short enough to read in full, which is rarer in this category than it should be.

Card creation feeFree
Monthly feeFree
Top-up fee
FX / conversion fee2.38% IOF + FX fee
Declined transaction fee
Minimum top-up

The test results

Attempts counted per merchant by hand from the log, so a single declined order does not skew the rate.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Steam827693%cleared first time; a second charge a week later also went through
Epic Games Store675988%went through on a fresh card with the issuer's default address
Google Play514180%no friction, and no AVS prompt
PlayStation Network3300%Range blocked at the acquirer. Declined before the authorisation was even routed.
Nike US25936%Soft decline on the retry after an earlier failure on the same account.

Run from a Brazil-region account between 10 Jul to 28 Aug 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

One consistent miss: PlayStation Network. That acquirer appears to blocklist the range. Nike US also declined, though only once.

What to change before you retry

Do these first

  1. Paste the Brazil billing address Nubank generates rather than typing your own. One transposed digit is enough to fail the check.
  2. Bank transfer is the cheap funding route here, but it is not instant. Top up a day before a renewal rather than the same morning.
  3. Watch the 2.38% conversion fee. Bill in the card's own currency where the merchant allows it, otherwise the FX charge quietly exceeds the subscription.

Where we land

We would not build a whole spend strategy on one Debit range, but as one card among two or three it earns its place. If you find a merchant where it behaves differently, tell us and we will add it to the log.

What people ask us

What does the 538384 BIN tell a merchant?

Roughly: who issued it, where, and what kind of product it is. Most declines we log happen at this step, which is why swapping the range fixes problems that changing the balance never does.

Is 538384 a real card number?

No, and this trips people up. 538384 is a range identifier shared across every card Nubank issues in Brazil. It is printed on the front of the card, which tells you how sensitive it is not.

Why would 538384 be declined if the range is fine?

Changing one variable at a time is the only way to diagnose this. Address first, then card, then the connection country. We have seen people change all three and learn nothing.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

Shared by design. Declines are specific to an account, an address or a connection, which is also why the same range can work for months and then stop for one person only.

How we got these numbers

We bought a Nubank card, funded it, and pushed 258 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 10 Jul to 28 Aug 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 185 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 01 September 2026 · 258 charges on record for this range.