BIN lookup · Visa · United States · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

BIN 455555: United States Visa Virtual Card (Debit)

The takeaway

126 of 173 attempts cleared, and most of those came from three merchants: Epic Games Store, Netflix, Hugging Face.

455555Visa United StatesDebit 126/173 cleared

This range belongs to Solayer Emerald Card. Issued out of United States on Visa, classed as Debit by most acquirers.

What the six digits say

BIN
455555
Card network
Visa
Issuing country
United States
Card type
Debit
Issued by
Solayer Emerald Card
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
ID + proof
3-D Secure
Yes
AVS check
No
Billing address
Global
Funding methods
Crypto
Max cards per account
Multiple
Issuer risk rating
Medium

Costs, stacked up

The first charge carries no issuance fee. Every charge after it carries no top-up fee, and outside USD, no FX markup. Compare on funding cost rather than signup fee. The funding side is what you pay every month for years.

Card creation feeFree for existing users / $20 annual fee for new users
Monthly feeFree
Top-up fee
FX / conversion fee
Declined transaction fee
Minimum top-up

Where 455555 clears, and where it does not

Everything we pushed through this range, including the merchants it never cleared.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Epic Games Store555295%went through on a fresh card with the issuer's default address
Netflix443989%went through on a fresh card with the issuer's default address
Hugging Face342985%went through on a fresh card with the issuer's default address
Crunchyroll2200%Soft decline on the retry after an earlier failure on the same account.
Tidal18633%Geo mismatch. The connection country did not match the card's country of issue.

Run from a United States-region account between 05 Jul to 30 Aug 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

Crunchyroll is the one to avoid. Its fraud rules appear to treat Debit ranges as high risk by default.

What to change before you retry

Getting it to work first time

  1. Funding is crypto-first. Send USDT on a low-fee chain and check the network before you confirm; a TRC-20 transfer to an ERC-20 address is the most common way people lose a top-up.
  2. This is an anonymous-account product. There is no meaningful account recovery, so export the card details and the billing address the moment you create them.
  3. Paste the United States billing address Solayer Emerald Card generates rather than typing your own. One transposed digit is enough to fail the check.

Worth it?

This is the range I would give someone who has never used a virtual card. Low balance requirement and the failure modes are easy to diagnose. Nothing here makes it the best option, and nothing makes it a bad one.

Questions we get about 455555

What does the 455555 BIN tell a merchant?

In practice the checkout reads Solayer Emerald Card / United States / Debit and decides. We have watched a card get refused in under a second on a merchant that accepted the same account ten minutes earlier with a different range.

Is 455555 a real card number?

It is the first six of sixteen digits. The remaining ten identify the account, and only Solayer Emerald Card can map those. A BIN alone will never get anyone into your money.

Why would 455555 be declined if the range is fine?

Of the 173 attempts behind this page, the losses broke down as address mismatch first, incomplete 3-D Secure second, and merchant-side range blocks a distant third. Only the last one is about 455555.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

Yes, and it is worth internalising. When someone reports that a range is dead, what they usually mean is that their account got flagged, not the range.

What we did

We bought a Solayer Emerald Card card, funded it, and pushed 173 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 05 Jul to 30 Aug 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 126 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 01 September 2026 · 173 charges on record for this range.