BIN lookup · UnionPay · Singapore · log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC

BIN 622765 (Singapore, UnionPay) - What It Works On

The gist

The range did well against Epic Games Store, GitHub Copilot, Steam. We logged 139 successful authorizations out of 193 attempts across the test window.

622765UnionPay SingaporePrepaid 139/193 cleared

A reader asked us to check this Gpayvcc range because a forum post claimed 622765 was dead. It is not. Here is what we found running it through real merchant checkouts.

What 622765 actually is

BIN
622765
Card network
UnionPay
Issuing country
Singapore
Card type
Prepaid
Issued by
Gpayvcc
Card form
Virtual only
KYC tier
No KYC
3-D Secure
Not published
AVS check
No
Billing address
Not published
Funding methods
Crypto
Max cards per account
Not published
Issuer risk rating
High

What it costs to run

The money side is simple: no issuance fee, no top-up fee, and no FX markup on anything billed outside USD. Nothing is hidden. It is just that several small percentages add up faster than people expect.

Card creation feeFree (first card); varies by tier for subsequent
Monthly fee
Top-up fee
FX / conversion fee
Declined transaction feeInactivity fee after 12 months idle
Minimum top-up€50 minimum top-up

Results by merchant

Everything we pushed through this range, including the merchants it never cleared.

Merchant by merchant

MerchantAttemptsClearedRateWhat happened
Epic Games Store615590%cleared, 3-D Secure completed in-app in under 20 seconds
GitHub Copilot504590%no friction, and no AVS prompt
Steam383284%first charge and renewal four weeks later both cleared
Hulu2500%Soft decline on the retry after an earlier failure on the same account.
PlayStation Network19737%Range blocked at the acquirer. Declined before the authorisation was even routed.

Run from a Singapore-region account between 31 Jul to 04 Sep 2026, with the billing address set to the issuer default unless noted. Declines were logged with the reason the gateway returned.

Failures we could not fix

The weak spot is Hulu, which declined every time. Everything else was either clean or fixed by correcting the billing address.

What to change before you retry

Do these first

  1. Paste the Singapore billing address Gpayvcc generates rather than typing your own. One transposed digit is enough to fail the check.
  2. This range does not advertise 3-D Secure. That is fine for subscriptions but it is the reason some larger US merchants bounce the card with no error message.
  3. Our risk rating for this issuer is on the high side. Keep balances low and do not park money on the card between charges.

Final word

Overall a solid Prepaid range for Singapore-region accounts. Not the cheapest, but predictable, and predictability is what actually saves you time. If your only requirement is that the payment goes through, this range meets it.

Questions we get about 622765

What does the 622765 BIN tell a merchant?

In practice the checkout reads Gpayvcc / Singapore / Prepaid and decides. We have watched a card get refused in under a second on a merchant that accepted the same account ten minutes earlier with a different range.

Is 622765 a real card number?

No, and this trips people up. 622765 is a range identifier shared across every card Gpayvcc issues in Singapore. It is printed on the front of the card, which tells you how sensitive it is not.

Why would 622765 be declined if the range is fine?

Changing one variable at a time is the only way to diagnose this. Address first, then card, then the connection country. We have seen people change all three and learn nothing.

Can thousands of people share the same BIN?

Yes, and it is worth internalising. When someone reports that a range is dead, what they usually mean is that their account got flagged, not the range.

Method

We bought a Gpayvcc card, funded it, and pushed 193 charges through live merchant checkout pages between 31 Jul to 04 Sep 2026. Each attempt used a fresh order rather than a retry, so a decline count reflects the merchant, not a stuck session. 139 cleared.

Counting rules

Renewals count alongside first charges, which is why a range that passed once and failed a month later reads lower here than on a first-charge-only list. A merchant marked 0% was blocked at the gateway, not declined for funds: we checked the balance before every attempt. Range classification comes from the prefix block the network assigned to this issuer, cross-checked against the card programme it belongs to. Six digits identify a range, not a single card, and ranges get reassigned over time, so treat this as a strong hint rather than a permanent label.

Log through 13 Sep 2026 14:40 UTC · rate last re-checked 07 September 2026 · 193 charges on record for this range.